ALEX · Executive Summary
Comparable-sales valuation · Listed Property Buyer Model · Williamson County
ALEX’s statistical model uses five comparable sales. Each sale is carried to this property’s 2,104 square feet on the fitted size relationship, then weighted by how near it is to this house in the matching metric.
ALEX AI Statistical Model
Minimum
Average
Median
Maximum
Traditional Arithmetic Model
Minimum
Average
Median
Maximum
The same five sales counted equally, without carrying them to this house’s size. How and why the two rows differ is explained below.
Compared on the average alone, ALEX’s valuation is $30,038 lower than the traditional arithmetic figure — 6.7% lower. The percentage is measured against the traditional average, the figure most readers would reach for first.
ALEX AI average
Traditional average
ALEX is lower by
Both averages are built from the same five sales with the same adjustments, Diane’s included, and both are net sale prices. The only thing that separates them is how each sale’s smaller size is carried to this house’s 2,104 square feet, which section 03 explains. Every sale and every adjustment is laid out in the appendix, section 06. The lower figure is the one the sales support once size is priced the way this market prices it.
Every one of the five comparables is smaller than this house. They run 1,652 to 1,960 square feet against this property’s 2,104. A smaller house sells for fewer dollars but more dollars per foot, so averaging their per-foot rates and applying that rate here lifts the answer by the difference shown in section 02. The statistical model fits the size relationship from the sales themselves and carries each one to 2,104 square feet before it counts — which is the whole of the difference between the two rows. The arithmetic figures are shown so that difference can be seen rather than taken on trust.
Offer, contract price
Seller-paid costs
Offer, net to seller
County appraised value, 2026
Financing
Down payment
Days on market
Price reductions
Move the price, not the credit. Because you are financing 100% with no down payment, that $8,000 of seller-paid closing costs helps make the VA purchase closable. Trading it away creates a higher cash requirement for you at the closing table. If necessary, raise the contract price and keep the $8,000 credit intact.
Every suggested counter keeps the full $8,000 credit for you at closing. No matter how you counter, consider always including the full $8,000 credit.
| Counter | Contract price | Seller credit | Net to seller | What it concedes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Where it stands | $419,900 | $8,000 | $411,900 | Full asking price; the credit is the only ask. |
| Split the difference | $424,000 | $8,000 | $416,000 | Half the room between here and the model average. |
| Ceiling | $428,100 | $8,000 | $420,100 | Net lands just under the model average. Past this you would be paying more than the evidence supports. |
All five are in Sierra Vista, this house’s own subdivision. Each column is one house, this one first, and every adjustment is shown at its final figure.
103 Maria CtThis houseMLS # 5525712 | 312 Susana DrSale 1MLS # 4046589 | 100 Susana DrSale 2MLS # 9111148 | 108 Susana DrSale 3MLS # 5219415 | 104 Susana DrSale 4MLS # 1592521 | 511 Debora DrSale 5MLS # 7511020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The house | ||||||
| Distance from this house | — | 0.31 mi NE | 0.60 mi NE | 0.55 mi NE | 0.58 mi NE | 0.05 mi SE |
| Living area | 2,104 sf | 1,960 sf | 1,652 sf | 1,690 sf | 1,770 sf | 1,931 sf |
| Bedrooms | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
| Bathrooms | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| Year built | 1992 | 1985 | 1994 | 1995 | 1995 | 1993 |
| Lot | 17,437 sf | 8,830 sf | 15,520 sf | 8,181 sf | 8,329 sf | 12,066 sf |
| Garage | 2-car | 2-car | 2-car | 2-car | 2-car | 2-car |
| Levels | One | One | One | One | One | One |
| The sale | ||||||
| Listing date | Sep 24, 2026 | Jun 5, 2026 | Mar 2, 2026 | Jan 15, 2026 | Oct 16, 2025 | Oct 8, 2025 |
| Closed | Active | Jul 31, 2026 | May 22, 2026 | May 22, 2026 | Dec 3, 2025 | Nov 14, 2025 |
| Days on market | 5 | 28 | 41 | 102 | 10 | 6 |
| Original list price | $419,900 | $392,000 | $380,000 | $380,000 | $374,900 | $370,000 |
| Last list price | $419,900 | $378,280 | $374,900 | $359,900 | $374,900 | $370,000 |
| Closed price | — | $375,000 | $375,500 | $352,500 | $380,000 | $375,000 |
| Buyer closing costs paid by the seller | — | −$6,625 | −$6,000 | — | — | — |
| Repairs at the buyer’s request | — | — | −$6,729 | — | — | −$13,000 |
| Net sale price | — | $368,375 | $362,771 | $352,500 | $380,000 | $362,000 |
| Time adjustment — Williamson County repeat-sales index | ||||||
| Months from sale to today | — | 2 months | 4 months | 4 months | 9 months | 10 months |
| Market trend to today | — | −$5,439 | +$2,350 | +$2,284 | +$5,724 | −$4,283 |
| Time-adjusted net sale price | — | $362,936 | $365,121 | $354,784 | $385,724 | $357,717 |
| Per square foot | — | $185 | $221 | $210 | $218 | $185 |
| AI & Diane Adjustments | ||||||
| Year built | — | +$25,786 | −$7,255 | −$10,575 | −$11,400 | −$3,620 |
| Lot size | — | +$40,724 | +$9,068 | +$43,795 | +$43,095 | +$25,412 |
| KitchenDiane revised | — | +$7,000 | — | −$15,000 | — | — |
| FlooringDiane revised | — | — | −$5,442 | −$5,288 | — | −$5,430 |
| Adjustments added by Diane | ||||||
| Master Bath | — | −$7,000 | — | −$15,000 | — | −$5,000 |
| Kitchen | — | — | −$4,000 | — | — | — |
| Back Yard | — | — | +$3,000 | — | — | — |
| 2nd bath | — | — | — | −$10,000 | — | — |
| Garage | — | — | — | −$2,000 | — | — |
| Yard/Trees | — | — | — | +$10,000 | — | — |
| Lighting | — | — | — | +$2,000 | — | — |
| Both Baths | — | — | — | — | −$10,000 | — |
| Yard Grooming | — | — | — | — | — | +$5,000 |
| From net sale price to this house | ||||||
| AI adjustments, including time | — | +$38,969 | −$4,906 | +$15,217 | +$20,319 | +$4,838 |
| Diane’s changes to AI lines | — | +$29,103 | +$3,628 | — | +$17,100 | +$7,240 |
| Diane’s added lines | — | −$7,000 | −$1,000 | −$15,000 | −$10,000 | — |
| Total adjustments | — | +$61,072 | −$2,278 | +$217 | +$27,419 | +$12,078 |
| Adjusted net sale price | — | $429,447 | $360,493 | $352,717 | $407,419 | $374,078 |
| Adjusted value per square foot | — | $219 | $218 | $209 | $230 | $194 |
| Indicated value at 2,104 sf — with Diane’s adjustments | — | $460,998 | $459,126 | $439,122 | $484,299 | $407,592 |
| Carried to 2,104 sf on the size slope — statistical model | — | $447,240 | $412,191 | $396,600 | $450,753 | $390,941 |
| Weight in the statistical model | — | 26.8% | 24.2% | 23.6% | 12.8% | 12.5% |
A row marked Diane revised is one where she changed the AI’s figure for at least one sale; her figures are in bold, and the lines she added are listed separately. Size is not a dollar line: each sale’s adjusted price is divided by its own living area and applied to 2,104 square feet. The row with Diane’s adjustments holds the five figures behind the Traditional Arithmetic row in section 01, and the carried row, weighted, gives the ALEX AI Statistical row.