MARKET STUDY All analysis covers resale homes only. New construction appears once, in its own section. Click any dot on the map for that sale.
Resale sales, 365 days
62
single-family resale homes
Median net sale price
$528,000
average $572,528
Median net price per SF
$209
average $212
Median days on market
82 days
average 102 days
1. Summary
This study looks at the 62 resale homes sold in Wolf Ranch in the 365 days to October 21, 2026. A full year is used because only 44 resale homes sold in the last 180 days. New construction is left out and shown on its own in section 8. The homes are compared four ways: by price, by living area, by year built and with or without a view. The first three are split into four equal groups (quartiles), each named by its range.
Key differences
The top group against the bottom group. Only real differences are listed. Section 9 explains each measure.
1.1 Quartiles by net sale price
Under $480K$480K–$527K$529K–$648KOver $648K
Higher-priced homes Over $648K
Are much larger.
Lower-priced homes Under $480K
Are much smaller.
1.2 Quartiles by living area
Under 2,312 SF2,312–2,576 SF2,615–3,029 SFOver 3,029 SF
Larger homes Over 3,029 SF
Sell for much more.
Are more likely to have a view.
Smaller homes Under 2,312 SF
Sell for much less.
Are less likely to have a view.
2. At a glance
One table per comparison. Shaded rows are real differences; the darkest cell is the highest. Gray rows show no clear difference. Prices are averages; days on market and year built are medians.
2.1 Quartiles by net sale price
Under $480K
$480K–$527K
$529K–$648K
Over $648K
Real difference?
Net price per SF
$203 per SF
$200 per SF
$215 per SF
$227 per SF
no
Living area
2,123 SFSmallest
2,571 SF
2,720 SF
3,483 SFLargest
✓ large
Year built
2020
2021
2021
2020
no
Days on market
100 days
102 days
48 days
63 days
no
Discount from original list
3.5%
8.4%
6.4%
10.4%
no
Price cut before sale
81%
80%
53%
50%
no
Seller paid closing costs or repairs
50%
53%
33%
25%
no
Has a view
50%
7%
33%
56%
no
2.2 Quartiles by living area
Under 2,312 SF
2,312–2,576 SF
2,615–3,029 SF
Over 3,029 SF
Real difference?
Net sale price
$438KLowest
$518K
$590K
$742KHighest
✓ large
Net price per SF
$219 per SF
$212 per SF
$210 per SF
$205 per SF
no
Year built
2020
2020
2021
2022
no
Days on market
80 days
52 days
78 days
139 days
no
Discount from original list
6.4%
5.8%
6.8%
9.5%
no
Price cut before sale
62%
60%
60%
81%
no
Seller paid closing costs or repairs
44%
53%
40%
25%
no
Has a view
50%
0%Fewest
40%
56%Most
✓ medium
2.3 Quartiles by year built
Before 2020
2020
2021–2022
After 2022
Real difference?
Net sale price
$575K
$555K
$532K
$636K
no
Net price per SF
$214 per SF
$224 per SF
$197 per SF
$211 per SF
no
Living area
2,667 SF
2,509 SF
2,703 SF
3,053 SF
no
Days on market
77 days
74 days
78 days
102 days
no
Discount from original list
8.8%
5.0%
3.9%
11.9%
no
Price cut before sale
62%
53%
71%
80%
no
Seller paid closing costs or repairs
38%
29%
65%
27%
no
Has a view
31%
35%
41%
40%
no
2.4 View and no view
View
No view
Real difference?
Net sale price
$600K
$559K
no
Net price per SF
$220 per SF
$206 per SF
no
Living area
2,732 SF
2,747 SF
no
Year built
2021
2021
no
Days on market
74 days
86 days
no
Discount from original list
8.4%
6.2%
no
Price cut before sale
65%
71%
no
Seller paid closing costs or repairs
26%
50%
no
3. Where the resale homes sold
Each dot is one resale home, colored by its price range. Use the buttons to show one price range at a time. Click a dot for that sale: address, close date, original and last list price, net sale price, living area, net sale per SF and days on market. Scroll or pinch to zoom.
4. Quartiles by net sale priceResale homes · 62 sales · October 22, 2025 – October 21, 2026
Sales ranked by net sale price and cut into four equal groups. This is the usual way to read a market by price.
Bottom line
Homes over $648K are about 1,360 SF (64%) larger than homes under $480K.
How to read this section. Each heading gives the finding. The gold box says whether the gap is real (✓, with its size) or could be chance (–). The section ends with its numbers; the tests are in section 9.3.
4.1 Net price per SF: no clear difference
The average is $227 per SF for homes over $648K and $203 per SF for homes under $480K. It does not move in a straight line; homes over $648K are highest. Defined in 9.1.2.
– No clear difference · could be chance
4.2 Homes over $648K are about 1,360 SF (64%) larger than homes under $480K
The average is 3,483 SF for homes over $648K and 2,123 SF for homes under $480K. It rises step by step from the lowest range to the highest. Defined in 9.1.3.
✓ Real difference · large
4.3 Year built: no clear difference
The median is 2020 for homes over $648K and 2020 for homes under $480K. It does not move in a straight line; homes $480K–$527K are highest. Defined in 9.1.4.
– No clear difference · could be chance
4.4 Days on market: no clear difference
The median is 63 days for homes over $648K and 100 days for homes under $480K. It does not move in a straight line; homes $480K–$527K are highest. Defined in 9.1.5.
– No clear difference · could be chance
4.5 Discount from original list: no clear difference
The average is 10.4% for homes over $648K and 3.5% for homes under $480K. It does not move in a straight line; homes over $648K are highest. Defined in 9.1.6.
– No clear difference · could be chance
4.6 How often: price cut before sale, seller paid closing costs or repairs, has a view
Each bar is the share of homes in the group, in percent.
50% of homes over $648K had a price cut before sale, against 81% of homes under $480K. Defined in 9.1.7.
25% of homes over $648K had the seller pay closing costs or repairs, against 50% of homes under $480K. Defined in 9.1.8.
56% of homes over $648K have a view, against 50% of homes under $480K. Defined in 9.1.9.
Price cut before sale: – No clear difference · could be chance
Seller paid closing costs or repairs: – No clear difference · could be chance
Has a view: – No clear difference · could be chance
4.7 The numbers: price and size
Under $480K16 sales
$480K–$527K15 sales
$529K–$648K15 sales
Over $648K16 sales
All62 sales
Real difference?
Net sale price average
$421,406
$508,733
$577,597
$778,707
$572,528
by design
Net price per SF average
$203
$200
$215
$227
$212
no
Living area average
2,123
2,571
2,720
3,483
2,727
✓ large
Year built median
2020
2021
2021
2020
2021
no
4.8 The numbers: selling
Under $480K16 sales
$480K–$527K15 sales
$529K–$648K15 sales
Over $648K16 sales
All62 sales
Real difference?
Days on market median
100
102
48
63
82
no
Discount from original list average
3.5%
8.4%
6.4%
10.4%
7.2%
no
Price cut before sale
81%
80%
53%
50%
66%
no
Seller paid closing costs or repairs
50%
53%
33%
25%
40%
no
Has a view
50%
7%
33%
56%
37%
no
Prices, price per SF, living area and discount are averages; days on market and year built are medians. The test behind each verdict is in 9.3.1.
5. Quartiles by living areaResale homes · 62 sales · October 22, 2025 – October 21, 2026
Sales ranked by living area and cut into four equal groups, from the smallest homes to the largest.
Bottom line
Homes over 3,029 SF sell for about $304K (69%) more than homes under 2,312 SF.
56% of homes over 3,029 SF have a view, against 50% of homes under 2,312 SF.
5.1 Homes over 3,029 SF sell for about $304K (69%) more than homes under 2,312 SF
The average is $742K for homes over 3,029 SF and $438K for homes under 2,312 SF. It rises step by step from the lowest range to the highest. Defined in 9.1.1.
✓ Real difference · large
5.2 Net price per SF: no clear difference
The average is $205 per SF for homes over 3,029 SF and $219 per SF for homes under 2,312 SF. It falls step by step from the lowest range to the highest. Defined in 9.1.2.
– No clear difference · could be chance
5.3 Year built: no clear difference
The median is 2022 for homes over 3,029 SF and 2020 for homes under 2,312 SF. It rises step by step from the lowest range to the highest. Defined in 9.1.4.
– No clear difference · could be chance
5.4 Days on market: no clear difference
The median is 139 days for homes over 3,029 SF and 80 days for homes under 2,312 SF. It does not move in a straight line; homes over 3,029 SF are highest. Defined in 9.1.5.
– No clear difference · could be chance
5.5 Discount from original list: no clear difference
The average is 9.5% for homes over 3,029 SF and 6.4% for homes under 2,312 SF. It does not move in a straight line; homes over 3,029 SF are highest. Defined in 9.1.6.
– No clear difference · could be chance
5.6 How often: price cut before sale, seller paid closing costs or repairs, has a view
Each bar is the share of homes in the group, in percent.
81% of homes over 3,029 SF had a price cut before sale, against 62% of homes under 2,312 SF. Defined in 9.1.7.
25% of homes over 3,029 SF had the seller pay closing costs or repairs, against 44% of homes under 2,312 SF. Defined in 9.1.8.
56% of homes over 3,029 SF have a view, against 50% of homes under 2,312 SF. Defined in 9.1.9.
Price cut before sale: – No clear difference · could be chance
Seller paid closing costs or repairs: – No clear difference · could be chance
Has a view: ✓ Real difference · medium
5.7 The numbers: price and size
Under 2,312 SF16 sales
2,312–2,576 SF15 sales
2,615–3,029 SF15 sales
Over 3,029 SF16 sales
All62 sales
Real difference?
Net sale price average
$437,798
$518,453
$590,060
$741,518
$572,528
✓ large
Net price per SF average
$219
$212
$210
$205
$212
no
Living area average
2,009
2,448
2,805
3,633
2,727
by design
Year built median
2020
2020
2021
2022
2021
no
5.8 The numbers: selling
Under 2,312 SF16 sales
2,312–2,576 SF15 sales
2,615–3,029 SF15 sales
Over 3,029 SF16 sales
All62 sales
Real difference?
Days on market median
80
52
78
139
82
no
Discount from original list average
6.4%
5.8%
6.8%
9.5%
7.2%
no
Price cut before sale
62%
60%
60%
81%
66%
no
Seller paid closing costs or repairs
44%
53%
40%
25%
40%
no
Has a view
50%
0%
40%
56%
37%
✓ medium
Prices, price per SF, living area and discount are averages; days on market and year built are medians. The test behind each verdict is in 9.3.2.
6. Quartiles by year builtResale homes · 62 sales · October 22, 2025 – October 21, 2026
Sales ranked by year built and cut into four groups, from the oldest to the newest. Homes built in the same year always stay in the same group, so group sizes can differ a little.
Bottom line: no measure differs enough between the groups to rule out chance.
6.1 Net sale price: no clear difference
The average is $636K for homes built after 2022 and $575K for homes built before 2020. It does not move in a straight line; homes built after 2022 are highest. Defined in 9.1.1.
– No clear difference · could be chance
6.2 Net price per SF: no clear difference
The average is $211 per SF for homes built after 2022 and $214 per SF for homes built before 2020. It does not move in a straight line; homes built 2020 are highest. Defined in 9.1.2.
– No clear difference · could be chance
6.3 Living area: no clear difference
The average is 3,053 SF for homes built after 2022 and 2,667 SF for homes built before 2020. It does not move in a straight line; homes built after 2022 are highest. Defined in 9.1.3.
– No clear difference · could be chance
6.4 Days on market: no clear difference
The median is 102 days for homes built after 2022 and 77 days for homes built before 2020. It does not move in a straight line; homes built after 2022 are highest. Defined in 9.1.5.
– No clear difference · could be chance
6.5 Discount from original list: no clear difference
The average is 11.9% for homes built after 2022 and 8.8% for homes built before 2020. It does not move in a straight line; homes built after 2022 are highest. Defined in 9.1.6.
– No clear difference · could be chance
6.6 How often: price cut before sale, seller paid closing costs or repairs, has a view
Each bar is the share of homes in the group, in percent.
80% of homes built after 2022 had a price cut before sale, against 62% of homes built before 2020. Defined in 9.1.7.
27% of homes built after 2022 had the seller pay closing costs or repairs, against 38% of homes built before 2020. Defined in 9.1.8.
40% of homes built after 2022 have a view, against 31% of homes built before 2020. Defined in 9.1.9.
Price cut before sale: – No clear difference · could be chance
Seller paid closing costs or repairs: – No clear difference · could be chance
Has a view: – No clear difference · could be chance
6.7 The numbers: price and size
Before 202013 sales
202017 sales
2021–202217 sales
After 202215 sales
All62 sales
Real difference?
Net sale price average
$575,227
$555,318
$531,971
$635,660
$572,528
no
Net price per SF average
$214
$224
$197
$211
$212
no
Living area average
2,667
2,509
2,703
3,053
2,727
no
Year built median
2018
2020
2022
2023
2021
by design
6.8 The numbers: selling
Before 202013 sales
202017 sales
2021–202217 sales
After 202215 sales
All62 sales
Real difference?
Days on market median
77
74
78
102
82
no
Discount from original list average
8.8%
5.0%
3.9%
11.9%
7.2%
no
Price cut before sale
62%
53%
71%
80%
66%
no
Seller paid closing costs or repairs
38%
29%
65%
27%
40%
no
Has a view
31%
35%
41%
40%
37%
no
Prices, price per SF, living area and discount are averages; days on market and year built are medians. The test behind each verdict is in 9.3.3.
7. View and no viewResale homes · 62 sales · October 22, 2025 – October 21, 2026
Sales where the MLS lists a view (greenbelt or park, trees, golf course, hill country, water and similar) against those listing none or only the neighborhood. 5 sales whose MLS view entry is only “See Remarks” are left out.
Bottom line: no measure differs enough between the groups to rule out chance.
7.1 Net sale price: no clear difference
The average is $600K for homes with a view and $559K for homes without a view. Defined in 9.1.1.
– No clear difference · could be chance
7.2 Net price per SF: no clear difference
The average is $220 per SF for homes with a view and $206 per SF for homes without a view. Defined in 9.1.2.
– No clear difference · could be chance
7.3 Living area: no clear difference
The average is 2,732 SF for homes with a view and 2,747 SF for homes without a view. Defined in 9.1.3.
– No clear difference · could be chance
7.4 Year built: no clear difference
The median is 2021 for homes with a view and 2021 for homes without a view. Defined in 9.1.4.
– No clear difference · could be chance
7.5 Days on market: no clear difference
The median is 74 days for homes with a view and 86 days for homes without a view. Defined in 9.1.5.
– No clear difference · could be chance
7.6 Discount from original list: no clear difference
The average is 8.4% for homes with a view and 6.2% for homes without a view. Defined in 9.1.6.
– No clear difference · could be chance
7.7 How often: price cut before sale, seller paid closing costs or repairs
Each bar is the share of homes in the group, in percent.
65% of homes with a view had a price cut before sale, against 71% of homes without a view. Defined in 9.1.7.
26% of homes with a view had the seller pay closing costs or repairs, against 50% of homes without a view. Defined in 9.1.8.
Price cut before sale: – No clear difference · could be chance
Seller paid closing costs or repairs: – No clear difference · could be chance
7.8 The numbers: price and size
View23 sales
No view34 sales
All57 sales
Real difference?
Net sale price average
$600,090
$558,761
$575,438
no
Net price per SF average
$220
$206
$212
no
Living area average
2,732
2,747
2,741
no
Year built median
2021
2021
2021
no
7.9 The numbers: selling
View23 sales
No view34 sales
All57 sales
Real difference?
Days on market median
74
86
78
no
Discount from original list average
8.4%
6.2%
7.1%
no
Price cut before sale
65%
71%
68%
no
Seller paid closing costs or repairs
26%
50%
40%
no
Prices, price per SF, living area and discount are averages; days on market and year built are medians. The test behind each verdict is in 9.3.4.
8. New constructionbasic statistics · 154 sales · October 22, 2025 – October 21, 2026
Homes sold new by the builder in the same 365 days. They are left out of every other section and shown here as basic figures only: 154 sales, no groups, no tests.
Note: these are only the new-construction sales reported in ABOR MLS. Builders often sell homes without listing them in the MLS, so these figures do not necessarily represent all new-construction sales in Wolf Ranch.
Measure
Average
Median
Sales
154
Net sale price
$639,705
$610,000
Net price per SF
$220
$216
Living area (SF)
2,923
2,916
Days on market
161
136
Discount from original list
12.4%
12.5%
Price cut before sale
76% of sales
Seller paid closing costs or repairs
54% of sales
Year built
2022–2026
Same definitions as the rest of the study (section 9). New construction = NewConstructionYN true, or PropertyCondition “New Construction” or “Under Construction”.
9. Appendix: measures, methods and tests
Each measure and method three ways: in plain words, as statistics, and with the data from this study.
9.1 Measures
9.1.1 Net sale price
In simple terms
What the seller actually kept: the closing price, less money the seller gave back to the buyer for closing costs or repairs. It is the truest price for comparing homes.
Statistically
Net = ClosePrice − ACTRIS_BuyersClsgCostPdbySell − ACTRIS_RepairsAmount (a blank counts as $0). Summarized by the arithmetic mean in the slices.
The data
62 resale sales. Average $572,528; median $528,000; standard deviation $145,150; middle half (25th–75th percentile) $476,325–$648,850; lowest $348,000, highest $992,511. 25 sales had a seller payment; their median payment was $4,701.
9.1.2 Net price per SF
In simple terms
Net sale price divided by the heated and cooled square feet. It puts homes of different sizes on the same footing: did buyers pay more for each square foot, not just for more square feet?
Statistically
psf = Net ÷ LivingArea, per sale; summarized by the mean of the per-sale ratios.
The data
62 resale sales. Average $212; median $209; standard deviation $27; middle half (25th–75th percentile) $191–$232; lowest $143, highest $267.
9.1.3 Living area
In simple terms
The heated and cooled space, as listed in the MLS. Garages and porches are not counted.
Statistically
RESO LivingArea, in square feet. Sales under 400 SF are treated as entry errors and left out.
The data
62 resale sales. Average 2,727; median 2,596; standard deviation 686; middle half (25th–75th percentile) 2,287–3,030; lowest 1,585, highest 5,025.
9.1.4 Year built
In simple terms
The year the home was finished, as listed in the MLS. It shows whether a group leans to older or newer phases of the community.
Statistically
RESO YearBuilt; summarized by the median, with the 25th–75th percentile (middle half) on the charts.
The data
62 resale sales. Average 2021; median 2021; standard deviation 2; middle half (25th–75th percentile) 2020–2022; lowest 2017, highest 2025.
9.1.5 Days on market
In simple terms
How many days the home was on the market before the buyer's offer was accepted, counting any earlier listing periods (relists). This is the days on market agents and clients quote.
Statistically
CDOM = max(CumulativeDaysOnMarket, DaysOnMarket, PurchaseContractDate − ListingContractDate). The MLS counter can freeze at a price change, so the contract-date gap is a floor. Summarized by the median, because a few homes that sat for months pull an average up.
The data
62 resale sales. Average 102; median 82; standard deviation 91; middle half (25th–75th percentile) 40–131; lowest 5, highest 461. 0 sales went under contract on their listing date (0 days).
9.1.6 Discount from original list
In simple terms
How far below the first asking price the home sold, after seller payments. It measures how much negotiating room sellers gave up. A negative figure means the home sold above its first asking price.
Statistically
Discount % = (OriginalListPrice − Net) ÷ OriginalListPrice × 100, per sale; summarized by the mean.
The data
62 resale sales. Average 7.2%; median 6.2%; standard deviation 12.2%; middle half (25th–75th percentile) 2.5%–11.9%; lowest −67.9%, highest 28.9%. 2 sales closed above their first asking price.
9.1.7 Price cut before sale
In simple terms
The asking price was lowered at least once before the home went under contract.
Statistically
Indicator: ListPrice at close < OriginalListPrice. Reported as the share of sales (%).
The data
41 of 62 resale sales (66.1%).
9.1.8 Seller paid closing costs or repairs
In simple terms
The seller paid some of the buyer's closing costs or repairs.
Statistically
Indicator: ACTRIS_BuyersClsgCostPdbySell + ACTRIS_RepairsAmount > 0. Reported as the share of sales (%).
The data
25 of 62 resale sales (40.3%).
9.1.9 Has a view
In simple terms
The MLS says the home looks over something: a greenbelt or park, trees, golf course, hill country, water and similar.
Statistically
View = the View field holds any entry other than “None”, “Neighborhood” or “See Remarks”. No view = only “None” and/or “Neighborhood”. A record whose only entry is “See Remarks” cannot be classified and is left out of the view slice.
The data
23 sales with a view, 34 without, 5 unclassified. Most common View entries: None 22, Neighborhood 21, Trees/Woods 14, Park/Greenbelt 13, See Remarks 7, Hill Country 4, Pond 2, Golf Course 1.
9.2 Methods
9.2.1 Data source
In simple terms
Every figure comes from the Austin Board of REALTORS® MLS, read live by ALEX. No figure is estimated or typed in.
Statistically
Bridge Interactive RESO Web API (OData), ABOR dataset, every field returned. Filter: StandardStatus = Closed, PropertyType = Residential, City = Georgetown, SubdivisionName contains any of “wolf ranch”, “wolf ranch west”, “wolf ranch west bend”, “wolf ranch west sub” (case-insensitive). A record is kept when its subdivision name belongs to the Wolf Ranch family, the same rule comparable sales use (it includes Wolf Ranch West Ph 1 Sec 3, Wolf Ranch West Bend, proven adjacent and priced alike).
The data
Pulled October 22, 2026: 216 closed Wolf Ranch records over the prior year, in ZIP 78628. 24 subdivision spellings kept, the most common: Wolf Ranch (133); Wolf Ranch West Bend (15); Wolf Ranch - West Bend (11); Wolf Ranch: 51ft. lots (6); Wolf Ranch West Sec 4A (5); Wolf Ranch West Ph 1 Sec 3 (5); Wolf Ranch West (5); Wolf Ranch - 70' (4); WOLF RANCH (3); Wolf Ranch West Ph 2 Sec 2 (3); Wolf Ranch West Ph 2 Sec 3 (3); Wolf Ranch West Sec 2G (3); and 12 more (20 records). Names found by the search but not part of Wolf Ranch, left out: Wolf Ranch South Fork (12).
9.2.2 Study window
In simple terms
The most recent 365 days of closed sales: recent enough to describe today's market, long enough to give each group plenty of sales. The usual window is 180 days; it holds only 44 resale sales here (under 80), so the full year is used.
Statistically
CloseDate from October 22, 2025 to October 21, 2026 inclusive.
The data
216 single-family sales in the window: 62 resale, 154 new construction.
9.2.3 Resale and new construction
In simple terms
A resale home was previously owned. New construction is sold by the builder and behaves differently, so it is kept out of every analysis and reported once on its own.
Statistically
New construction = NewConstructionYN true, or PropertyCondition contains “New Construction” or “Under Construction”. Everything else is resale.
The data
62 resale; 154 new construction.
9.2.4 Sales left out
In simple terms
A few records cannot be used as entered and are left out before any analysis.
Statistically
Excluded: PropertySubType other than Single Family Residence; no OriginalListPrice; LivingArea under 400 SF; seller payments above 10% of ClosePrice (treated as entry errors).
The data
None in this window.
9.2.5 Quartiles and groups
In simple terms
Sales lined up from lowest to highest and cut into four groups of about equal size. Each group is named by its range, for example “Under $480K”.
Statistically
Sort by the slicing variable; cut k sits at round(nk/4), k = 1…3. A cut that would split tied values moves to the nearer edge of the tie. A group under 3 sales merges into its smaller neighbor. Range names use the next group's lowest value (“Under”) and the previous group's highest value (“Over”/“After”).
The data
Quartiles by net sale price: Under $480K: $348,000–$475,000 (16 sales); $480K–$527K: $480,299–$527,000 (15 sales); $529K–$648K: $529,000–$647,500 (15 sales); Over $648K: $649,300–$992,511 (16 sales) Quartiles by living area: Under 2,312 SF: 1,585–2,279 SF (16 sales); 2,312–2,576 SF: 2,312–2,576 SF (15 sales); 2,615–3,029 SF: 2,615–3,029 SF (15 sales); Over 3,029 SF: 3,031–5,025 SF (16 sales) Quartiles by year built: Before 2020: 2017–2019 (13 sales); 2020: 2020–2020 (17 sales); 2021–2022: 2021–2022 (17 sales); After 2022: 2023–2025 (15 sales) View and no view: View: MLS lists a view (23 sales); No view: None or Neighborhood (34 sales)
9.2.6 Average and median
In simple terms
The average adds the values and divides by how many; one very expensive home can pull it up. The median is the middle value, with half above and half below.
Statistically
Mean x̄ = (1/n) Σ xᵢ; median = 50th percentile. Price, price per SF, living area and discount use the mean; days on market and year built use the median (skewed or whole-year values).
The data
Net sale price: average $572,528, median $528,000. Days on market: average 102, median 82: the average is pulled up by a few long listings.
9.2.7 Kruskal–Wallis test
In simple terms
Checks whether a measure really differs across the four groups of a slice. It uses each sale's rank, not its value, so a few extreme sales cannot drive the answer.
Statistically
H = [12/(n(n+1))] Σ Rⱼ²/nⱼ − 3(n+1), compared with χ² on k − 1 degrees of freedom (Kruskal & Wallis, 1952). Effect size ε² = H/(n − 1): ≥ .01 small, ≥ .06 medium, ≥ .14 large (Tomczak & Tomczak, 2014). A slice is tested only when every group has at least 5 sales; smaller groups are described, not tested.
The data
Run on every measure in sections 4–6; each result is in 9.3.
9.2.8 Mann–Whitney U test
In simple terms
The same check when there are only two groups: view against no view.
Statistically
Two-sided U test (Mann & Whitney, 1947). Effect size = rank-biserial correlation |1 − 2U/(n₁n₂)|: ≥ .10 small, ≥ .30 medium, ≥ .50 large (Kerby, 2014; Cohen, 1988).
The data
Run on every measure in section 7; results in 9.3.
9.2.9 Chi-square test
In simple terms
Checks whether a yes/no share (price cut, seller payment, view) differs between groups more than chance would.
Statistically
Pearson χ² on the 2 × k table of counts, no continuity correction (Pearson, 1900). Effect size Cramér's V = √(χ²/n): ≥ .10 small, ≥ .30 medium, ≥ .50 large (Cramér, 1946).
The data
Run on the three shares in every slice; results in 9.3.
9.2.10 Real difference (significance)
In simple terms
“Real difference” means a gap this large would be very unlikely if the groups were really alike. Because many measures are checked in each slice, the bar is set higher than usual.
Statistically
Significant when p < 0.05 ÷ m, where m is the number of measures tested in that slice (Bonferroni; Dunn, 1961). The slicing variable itself differs by design and is not tested.
The data
Quartiles by net sale price: m = 8, threshold p < 0.0063; Quartiles by living area: m = 8, threshold p < 0.0063; Quartiles by year built: m = 8, threshold p < 0.0063; View and no view: m = 8, threshold p < 0.0063
9.2.11 Size of a difference
In simple terms
A difference can be real but small. The size word (small, medium, large) says how much the groups pull apart.
Statistically
ε² for Kruskal–Wallis, rank-biserial r for Mann–Whitney, Cramér's V for chi-square, with the thresholds above; below the small threshold the size is “negligible”.
The data
3 real differences across the four slices; sizes are listed in 9.3.
9.2.12 Rounding in the text
In simple terms
Headings and sentences round figures so they read easily; the tables at the end of each section give them in full.
Statistically
Prices in headings round to the nearest $1K; price per SF and days on market to the nearest whole number; living area to the nearest 10 SF; shares and percentage gaps to whole percents.
The data
Days on market is always shown in days.
9.3 Test results
Every test behind every gold box. Statistic, degrees of freedom (df), p-value, the threshold it must beat, and the size of the difference.
9.3.1 Quartiles by net sale price
Measure
Test
Statistic
df
p-value
Threshold
Real difference?
Effect size
Size
Net price per SF
Kruskal–Wallis
H = 10.39
3
0.0155
p < 0.0063
No
ε² = 0.170
large
Living area
Kruskal–Wallis
H = 36.17
3
< 0.0001
p < 0.0063
Yes
ε² = 0.593
large
Year built
Kruskal–Wallis
H = 0.76
3
0.8597
p < 0.0063
No
ε² = 0.012
small
Days on market
Kruskal–Wallis
H = 7.34
3
0.0619
p < 0.0063
No
ε² = 0.120
medium
Discount from original list
Kruskal–Wallis
H = 1.96
3
0.5807
p < 0.0063
No
ε² = 0.032
small
Price cut before sale
Chi-square
χ² = 5.88
3
0.1178
p < 0.0063
No
Cramér’s V = 0.308
medium
Seller paid closing costs or repairs
Chi-square
χ² = 3.54
3
0.3152
p < 0.0063
No
Cramér’s V = 0.239
small
Has a view
Chi-square
χ² = 9.70
3
0.0213
p < 0.0063
No
Cramér’s V = 0.396
medium
9.3.2 Quartiles by living area
Measure
Test
Statistic
df
p-value
Threshold
Real difference?
Effect size
Size
Net sale price
Kruskal–Wallis
H = 38.09
3
< 0.0001
p < 0.0063
Yes
ε² = 0.624
large
Net price per SF
Kruskal–Wallis
H = 1.20
3
0.7536
p < 0.0063
No
ε² = 0.020
small
Year built
Kruskal–Wallis
H = 2.99
3
0.3930
p < 0.0063
No
ε² = 0.049
small
Days on market
Kruskal–Wallis
H = 7.84
3
0.0495
p < 0.0063
No
ε² = 0.128
medium
Discount from original list
Kruskal–Wallis
H = 6.63
3
0.0848
p < 0.0063
No
ε² = 0.109
medium
Price cut before sale
Chi-square
χ² = 2.23
3
0.5260
p < 0.0063
No
Cramér’s V = 0.190
small
Seller paid closing costs or repairs
Chi-square
χ² = 2.70
3
0.4411
p < 0.0063
No
Cramér’s V = 0.208
small
Has a view
Chi-square
χ² = 12.56
3
0.0057
p < 0.0063
Yes
Cramér’s V = 0.450
medium
9.3.3 Quartiles by year built
Measure
Test
Statistic
df
p-value
Threshold
Real difference?
Effect size
Size
Net sale price
Kruskal–Wallis
H = 6.59
3
0.0861
p < 0.0063
No
ε² = 0.108
medium
Net price per SF
Kruskal–Wallis
H = 7.63
3
0.0543
p < 0.0063
No
ε² = 0.125
medium
Living area
Kruskal–Wallis
H = 5.87
3
0.1181
p < 0.0063
No
ε² = 0.096
medium
Days on market
Kruskal–Wallis
H = 3.50
3
0.3206
p < 0.0063
No
ε² = 0.057
small
Discount from original list
Kruskal–Wallis
H = 5.44
3
0.1425
p < 0.0063
No
ε² = 0.089
medium
Price cut before sale
Chi-square
χ² = 2.88
3
0.4102
p < 0.0063
No
Cramér’s V = 0.216
small
Seller paid closing costs or repairs
Chi-square
χ² = 6.22
3
0.1013
p < 0.0063
No
Cramér’s V = 0.317
medium
Has a view
Chi-square
χ² = 0.42
3
0.9356
p < 0.0063
No
Cramér’s V = 0.083
negligible
9.3.4 View and no view
Measure
Test
Statistic
df
p-value
Threshold
Real difference?
Effect size
Size
Net sale price
Mann–Whitney U
U = 445.00
—
0.3841
p < 0.0063
No
rank-biserial r = 0.138
small
Net price per SF
Mann–Whitney U
U = 506.00
—
0.0625
p < 0.0063
No
rank-biserial r = 0.294
small
Living area
Mann–Whitney U
U = 420.00
—
0.6429
p < 0.0063
No
rank-biserial r = 0.074
negligible
Year built
Mann–Whitney U
U = 401.00
—
0.8753
p < 0.0063
No
rank-biserial r = 0.026
negligible
Days on market
Mann–Whitney U
U = 338.50
—
0.3976
p < 0.0063
No
rank-biserial r = 0.134
small
Discount from original list
Mann–Whitney U
U = 403.00
—
0.8516
p < 0.0063
No
rank-biserial r = 0.031
negligible
Price cut before sale
Chi-square
χ² = 0.18
1
0.6687
p < 0.0063
No
Cramér’s V = 0.057
negligible
Seller paid closing costs or repairs
Chi-square
χ² = 3.26
1
0.0710
p < 0.0063
No
Cramér’s V = 0.239
small
9.4 Data notes
Left out of the analysis: 154 new-construction sales (basic statistics only, section 8); nothing else. Statistics: Python, NumPy 2.5.3, SciPy 1.18.1.
9.5 References
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
Cramér, H. (1946). Mathematical Methods of Statistics. Princeton University Press.
Dunn, O. J. (1961). Multiple comparisons among means. JASA, 56(293), 52–64.
Kerby, D. S. (2014). The simple difference formula: an approach to teaching nonparametric correlation. Comprehensive Psychology, 3, 11.IT.3.1.
Kruskal, W. H., & Wallis, W. A. (1952). Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. JASA, 47(260), 583–621.
Mann, H. B., & Whitney, D. R. (1947). On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18(1), 50–60.
Pearson, K. (1900). On the criterion that a given system of deviations… Philosophical Magazine, 50(302), 157–175.
Tomczak, M., & Tomczak, E. (2014). The need to report effect size estimates revisited. Trends in Sport Sciences, 21(1), 19–25.