Steiner Ranch
This study looks at the 96 resale homes sold in Steiner Ranch in the 180 days to November 1, 2026. New construction is left out and shown on its own in section 7. The homes are compared four ways: by price, by living area, by year built and with or without a view. The first three are split into four equal groups (quartiles), each named by its range.
Each comparison has its own section (3–6) with everything about it in one place: the key differences, a table of every measure at a glance, the charts and the numbers.
Each dot is one resale home, colored by its price range. Use the buttons to show one price range at a time. Click a dot for that sale: address, close date, original and last list price, net sale price, living area, net sale per SF and days on market. Scroll or pinch to zoom.
Sales ranked by net sale price and cut into four equal groups. This is the usual way to read a market by price.
- Homes over $1.16M are about 2,350 SF (99%) larger than homes under $670K.
- Homes over $1.16M sell for about $127 per SF (51%) more than homes under $670K.
- 92% of homes over $1.16M have a view, against 75% of homes under $670K.
- Homes over $1.16M are about 9 years newer than homes under $670K.
3.1 Key differences
The top group against the bottom group. Only real differences are listed. Section 8 explains each measure.
Higher-priced homes Over $1.16M
- Are much larger.
- Sell for more per square foot.
- Are more likely to have a view.
- Tend to be newer.
Lower-priced homes Under $670K
- Are much smaller.
- Sell for less per square foot.
- Are less likely to have a view.
- Tend to be older.
3.2 At a glance
Shaded rows are real differences; the darkest cell is the highest. Gray rows show no clear difference. Prices are averages; days on market and year built are medians.
| Under $670K | $670K–$840K | $842K–$1.16M | Over $1.16M | Real difference? | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net price per SF | $249 per SF | $249 per SFLowest | $293 per SF | $376 per SFHighest | ✓ large |
| Living area | 2,388 SFSmallest | 3,068 SF | 3,615 SF | 4,742 SFLargest | ✓ large |
| Year built | 1999Oldest | 2004 | 2005 | 2008Newest | ✓ large |
| Days on market | 36 days | 40 days | 51 days | 73 days | unclear |
| Discount from original list | 4.8% | 7.2% | 7.9% | 7.4% | unclear |
| Price cut before sale | 46% | 54% | 46% | 54% | unclear |
| Seller paid closing costs or repairs | 62% | 62% | 62% | 58% | unclear |
| Has a view | 75% | 33%Fewest | 79% | 92%Most | ✓ medium |
How to read this section. Each heading gives the finding. The gold box says whether the gap is real (✓, with its size) or could be chance (–). The section ends with its numbers; the tests are in section 8.3.
3.3 Homes over $1.16M sell for about $127 per SF (51%) more than homes under $670K
The average is $376 per SF for homes over $1.16M and $249 per SF for homes under $670K. It does not move in a straight line; homes over $1.16M are highest. Defined in 8.1.2.
3.4 Homes over $1.16M are about 2,350 SF (99%) larger than homes under $670K
The average is 4,742 SF for homes over $1.16M and 2,388 SF for homes under $670K. It rises step by step from the lowest range to the highest. Defined in 8.1.3.
3.5 Homes over $1.16M are about 9 years newer than homes under $670K
The median is 2008 for homes over $1.16M and 1999 for homes under $670K. It rises step by step from the lowest range to the highest. Defined in 8.1.4.
3.6 Days on market: no clear difference
The median is 73 days for homes over $1.16M and 36 days for homes under $670K. It rises step by step from the lowest range to the highest. Defined in 8.1.5.
3.7 Discount from original list: no clear difference
The average is 7.4% for homes over $1.16M and 4.8% for homes under $670K. It does not move in a straight line; homes $842K–$1.16M are highest. Defined in 8.1.6.
3.8 How often: price cut before sale, seller paid closing costs or repairs, has a view
Each bar is the share of homes in the group, in percent.
- 54% of homes over $1.16M had a price cut before sale, against 46% of homes under $670K. Defined in 8.1.7.
- 58% of homes over $1.16M had the seller pay closing costs or repairs, against 62% of homes under $670K. Defined in 8.1.8.
- 92% of homes over $1.16M have a view, against 75% of homes under $670K. Defined in 8.1.9.
3.9 The numbers: price and size
| Under $670K24 sales | $670K–$840K24 sales | $842K–$1.16M24 sales | Over $1.16M24 sales | All96 sales | Real difference? | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net sale price average | $584,930 | $758,354 | $1,052,778 | $1,825,508 | $1,055,393 | by design |
| Net price per SF average | $249 | $249 | $293 | $376 | $292 | ✓ large |
| Living area average | 2,388 | 3,068 | 3,615 | 4,742 | 3,453 | ✓ large |
| Year built median | 1999 | 2004 | 2005 | 2008 | 2005 | ✓ large |
3.10 The numbers: selling
| Under $670K24 sales | $670K–$840K24 sales | $842K–$1.16M24 sales | Over $1.16M24 sales | All96 sales | Real difference? | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Days on market median | 36 | 40 | 51 | 73 | 43 | unclear |
| Discount from original list average | 4.8% | 7.2% | 7.9% | 7.4% | 6.9% | unclear |
| Price cut before sale | 46% | 54% | 46% | 54% | 50% | unclear |
| Seller paid closing costs or repairs | 62% | 62% | 62% | 58% | 61% | unclear |
| Has a view | 75% | 33% | 79% | 92% | 70% | ✓ medium |
Prices, price per SF, living area and discount are averages; days on market and year built are medians. The test behind each verdict is in 8.3.1.
Sales ranked by living area and cut into four equal groups, from the smallest homes to the largest.
- Homes over 4,067 SF sell for about $1.20M (199%) more than homes under 2,760 SF.
- 96% of homes over 4,067 SF have a view, against 71% of homes under 2,760 SF.
- Homes over 4,067 SF sell for about $106 per SF (40%) more than homes under 2,760 SF.
- Homes over 4,067 SF are about 8 years newer than homes under 2,760 SF.
4.1 Key differences
The top group against the bottom group. Only real differences are listed. Section 8 explains each measure.
Larger homes Over 4,067 SF
- Sell for much more.
- Are more likely to have a view.
- Sell for more per square foot.
- Tend to be newer.
Smaller homes Under 2,760 SF
- Sell for much less.
- Are less likely to have a view.
- Sell for less per square foot.
- Tend to be older.
4.2 At a glance
Shaded rows are real differences; the darkest cell is the highest. Gray rows show no clear difference. Prices are averages; days on market and year built are medians.
| Under 2,760 SF | 2,760–3,334 SF | 3,347–4,067 SF | Over 4,067 SF | Real difference? | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net sale price | $603KLowest | $771K | $1.05M | $1.80MHighest | ✓ large |
| Net price per SF | $261 per SF | $253 per SFLowest | $286 per SF | $366 per SFHighest | ✓ large |
| Year built | 1999Oldest | 2000 | 2005 | 2007Newest | ✓ large |
| Days on market | 38 days | 29 days | 54 days | 73 days | unclear |
| Discount from original list | 6.0% | 6.3% | 6.6% | 8.5% | unclear |
| Price cut before sale | 54% | 38% | 50% | 58% | unclear |
| Seller paid closing costs or repairs | 58% | 67% | 62% | 58% | unclear |
| Has a view | 71% | 38%Fewest | 75% | 96%Most | ✓ medium |
4.3 Homes over 4,067 SF sell for about $1.20M (199%) more than homes under 2,760 SF
The average is $1.80M for homes over 4,067 SF and $603K for homes under 2,760 SF. It rises step by step from the lowest range to the highest. Defined in 8.1.1.
4.4 Homes over 4,067 SF sell for about $106 per SF (40%) more than homes under 2,760 SF
The average is $366 per SF for homes over 4,067 SF and $261 per SF for homes under 2,760 SF. It does not move in a straight line; homes over 4,067 SF are highest. Defined in 8.1.2.
4.5 Homes over 4,067 SF are about 8 years newer than homes under 2,760 SF
The median is 2007 for homes over 4,067 SF and 1999 for homes under 2,760 SF. It rises step by step from the lowest range to the highest. Defined in 8.1.4.
4.6 Days on market: no clear difference
The median is 73 days for homes over 4,067 SF and 38 days for homes under 2,760 SF. It does not move in a straight line; homes over 4,067 SF are highest. Defined in 8.1.5.
4.7 Discount from original list: no clear difference
The average is 8.5% for homes over 4,067 SF and 6.0% for homes under 2,760 SF. It rises step by step from the lowest range to the highest. Defined in 8.1.6.
4.8 How often: price cut before sale, seller paid closing costs or repairs, has a view
Each bar is the share of homes in the group, in percent.
- 58% of homes over 4,067 SF had a price cut before sale, against 54% of homes under 2,760 SF. Defined in 8.1.7.
- 58% of homes over 4,067 SF had the seller pay closing costs or repairs, against 58% of homes under 2,760 SF. Defined in 8.1.8.
- 96% of homes over 4,067 SF have a view, against 71% of homes under 2,760 SF. Defined in 8.1.9.
4.9 The numbers: price and size
| Under 2,760 SF24 sales | 2,760–3,334 SF24 sales | 3,347–4,067 SF24 sales | Over 4,067 SF24 sales | All96 sales | Real difference? | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net sale price average | $602,617 | $771,232 | $1,047,413 | $1,800,308 | $1,055,393 | ✓ large |
| Net price per SF average | $261 | $253 | $286 | $366 | $292 | ✓ large |
| Living area average | 2,324 | 3,050 | 3,653 | 4,785 | 3,453 | by design |
| Year built median | 1999 | 2000 | 2005 | 2007 | 2005 | ✓ large |
4.10 The numbers: selling
| Under 2,760 SF24 sales | 2,760–3,334 SF24 sales | 3,347–4,067 SF24 sales | Over 4,067 SF24 sales | All96 sales | Real difference? | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Days on market median | 38 | 29 | 54 | 73 | 43 | unclear |
| Discount from original list average | 6.0% | 6.3% | 6.6% | 8.5% | 6.9% | unclear |
| Price cut before sale | 54% | 38% | 50% | 58% | 50% | unclear |
| Seller paid closing costs or repairs | 58% | 67% | 62% | 58% | 61% | unclear |
| Has a view | 71% | 38% | 75% | 96% | 70% | ✓ medium |
Prices, price per SF, living area and discount are averages; days on market and year built are medians. The test behind each verdict is in 8.3.2.
Sales ranked by year built and cut into four groups, from the oldest to the newest. Homes built in the same year always stay in the same group, so group sizes can differ a little.
- 85% of homes built after 2006 had the seller pay closing costs or repairs, against 58% of homes built before 2000.
- Homes built after 2006 sell for about $806K (115%) more than homes built before 2000.
- Homes built after 2006 sell for about $93 per SF (36%) more than homes built before 2000.
- Homes built after 2006 are about 1,370 SF (50%) larger than homes built before 2000.
5.1 Key differences
The top group against the bottom group. Only real differences are listed. Section 8 explains each measure.
Newer homes After 2006
- More often have the seller pay buyer costs or repairs.
- Sell for much more.
- Sell for more per square foot.
- Are much larger.
Older homes Before 2000
- Less often have the seller pay buyer costs or repairs.
- Sell for much less.
- Sell for less per square foot.
- Are much smaller.
5.2 At a glance
Shaded rows are real differences; the darkest cell is the highest. Gray rows show no clear difference. Prices are averages; days on market and year built are medians.
| Before 2000 | 2000–2004 | 2005–2006 | After 2006 | Real difference? | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net sale price | $702KLowest | $901K | $1.08M | $1.51MHighest | ✓ large |
| Net price per SF | $257 per SFLowest | $265 per SF | $288 per SF | $351 per SFHighest | ✓ large |
| Living area | 2,720 SFSmallest | 3,340 SF | 3,663 SF | 4,092 SFLargest | ✓ large |
| Days on market | 28 days | 43 days | 53 days | 77 days | unclear |
| Discount from original list | 4.3% | 8.4% | 7.3% | 7.7% | unclear |
| Price cut before sale | 35% | 57% | 61% | 50% | unclear |
| Seller paid closing costs or repairs | 58% | 67% | 35%Fewest | 85%Most | ✓ medium |
| Has a view | 58% | 52% | 74% | 92% | unclear |
5.3 Homes built after 2006 sell for about $806K (115%) more than homes built before 2000
The average is $1.51M for homes built after 2006 and $702K for homes built before 2000. It rises step by step from the lowest range to the highest. Defined in 8.1.1.
5.4 Homes built after 2006 sell for about $93 per SF (36%) more than homes built before 2000
The average is $351 per SF for homes built after 2006 and $257 per SF for homes built before 2000. It rises step by step from the lowest range to the highest. Defined in 8.1.2.
5.5 Homes built after 2006 are about 1,370 SF (50%) larger than homes built before 2000
The average is 4,092 SF for homes built after 2006 and 2,720 SF for homes built before 2000. It rises step by step from the lowest range to the highest. Defined in 8.1.3.
5.6 Days on market: no clear difference
The median is 77 days for homes built after 2006 and 28 days for homes built before 2000. It rises step by step from the lowest range to the highest. Defined in 8.1.5.
5.7 Discount from original list: no clear difference
The average is 7.7% for homes built after 2006 and 4.3% for homes built before 2000. It does not move in a straight line; homes built 2000–2004 are highest. Defined in 8.1.6.
5.8 How often: price cut before sale, seller paid closing costs or repairs, has a view
Each bar is the share of homes in the group, in percent.
- 50% of homes built after 2006 had a price cut before sale, against 35% of homes built before 2000. Defined in 8.1.7.
- 85% of homes built after 2006 had the seller pay closing costs or repairs, against 58% of homes built before 2000. Defined in 8.1.8.
- 92% of homes built after 2006 have a view, against 58% of homes built before 2000. Defined in 8.1.9.
5.9 The numbers: price and size
| Before 200026 sales | 2000–200421 sales | 2005–200623 sales | After 200626 sales | All96 sales | Real difference? | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net sale price average | $701,608 | $901,114 | $1,084,923 | $1,507,663 | $1,055,393 | ✓ large |
| Net price per SF average | $257 | $265 | $288 | $351 | $292 | ✓ large |
| Living area average | 2,720 | 3,340 | 3,663 | 4,092 | 3,453 | ✓ large |
| Year built median | 1997 | 2003 | 2005 | 2010 | 2005 | by design |
5.10 The numbers: selling
| Before 200026 sales | 2000–200421 sales | 2005–200623 sales | After 200626 sales | All96 sales | Real difference? | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Days on market median | 28 | 43 | 53 | 77 | 43 | unclear |
| Discount from original list average | 4.3% | 8.4% | 7.3% | 7.7% | 6.9% | unclear |
| Price cut before sale | 35% | 57% | 61% | 50% | 50% | unclear |
| Seller paid closing costs or repairs | 58% | 67% | 35% | 85% | 61% | ✓ medium |
| Has a view | 58% | 52% | 74% | 92% | 70% | unclear |
Prices, price per SF, living area and discount are averages; days on market and year built are medians. The test behind each verdict is in 8.3.3.
Sales where the MLS lists a view (greenbelt or park, trees, golf course, hill country, water and similar) against those listing none or only the neighborhood. 2 sales whose MLS view entry is only “See Remarks” are left out.
- Homes with a view are about 5 years newer than homes without a view.
- Homes with a view are about 630 SF (21%) larger than homes without a view.
- Homes with a view sell about 2 percentage points further below their first asking price than homes without a view.
6.1 Key differences
The top group against the bottom group. Only real differences are listed. Section 8 explains each measure.
Homes with a view MLS lists a view
- Tend to be newer.
- Are larger.
- Sell further below their first asking price.
Homes without a view no view listed
- Tend to be older.
- Are smaller.
- Sell closer to their first asking price.
6.2 At a glance
Shaded rows are real differences; the darkest cell is the highest. Gray rows show no clear difference. Prices are averages; days on market and year built are medians.
| View | No view | Real difference? | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net sale price | $1.16M | $780K | unclear |
| Net price per SF | $303 per SF | $261 per SF | unclear |
| Living area | 3,617 SFLargest | 2,990 SFSmallest | ✓ medium |
| Year built | 2005Newest | 2000Oldest | ✓ medium |
| Days on market | 53 days | 30 days | unclear |
| Discount from original list | 7.6%Biggest | 5.2%Smallest | ✓ medium |
| Price cut before sale | 57% | 33% | unclear |
| Seller paid closing costs or repairs | 67% | 48% | unclear |
6.3 Net sale price: no clear difference
The average is $1.16M for homes with a view and $780K for homes without a view. Defined in 8.1.1.
6.4 Net price per SF: no clear difference
The average is $303 per SF for homes with a view and $261 per SF for homes without a view. Defined in 8.1.2.
6.5 Homes with a view are about 630 SF (21%) larger than homes without a view
The average is 3,617 SF for homes with a view and 2,990 SF for homes without a view. Defined in 8.1.3.
6.6 Homes with a view are about 5 years newer than homes without a view
The median is 2005 for homes with a view and 2000 for homes without a view. Defined in 8.1.4.
6.7 Days on market: no clear difference
The median is 53 days for homes with a view and 30 days for homes without a view. Defined in 8.1.5.
6.8 Homes with a view sell about 2 percentage points further below their first asking price than homes without a view
The average is 7.6% for homes with a view and 5.2% for homes without a view. Defined in 8.1.6.
6.9 How often: price cut before sale, seller paid closing costs or repairs
Each bar is the share of homes in the group, in percent.
- 57% of homes with a view had a price cut before sale, against 33% of homes without a view. Defined in 8.1.7.
- 67% of homes with a view had the seller pay closing costs or repairs, against 48% of homes without a view. Defined in 8.1.8.
6.10 The numbers: price and size
| View67 sales | No view27 sales | All94 sales | Real difference? | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net sale price average | $1,157,074 | $780,213 | $1,048,826 | unclear |
| Net price per SF average | $303 | $261 | $291 | unclear |
| Living area average | 3,617 | 2,990 | 3,437 | ✓ medium |
| Year built median | 2005 | 2000 | 2005 | ✓ medium |
6.11 The numbers: selling
| View67 sales | No view27 sales | All94 sales | Real difference? | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Days on market median | 53 | 30 | 43 | unclear |
| Discount from original list average | 7.6% | 5.2% | 6.9% | ✓ medium |
| Price cut before sale | 57% | 33% | 50% | unclear |
| Seller paid closing costs or repairs | 67% | 48% | 62% | unclear |
Prices, price per SF, living area and discount are averages; days on market and year built are medians. The test behind each verdict is in 8.3.4.
Homes sold new by the builder in the same 180 days. They are left out of every other section and shown here as basic figures only: 0 sales, no groups, no tests.
No new-construction sales were reported in ABOR MLS in this window.
Same definitions as the rest of the study (section 8). New construction = NewConstructionYN true, or PropertyCondition “New Construction” or “Under Construction”.
Each measure and method three ways: in plain words, as statistics, and with the data from this study.
8.1 Measures
8.1.1 Net sale price
- In simple terms
- What the seller actually kept: the closing price, less money the seller gave back to the buyer for closing costs or repairs. It is the truest price for comparing homes.
- Statistically
- Net = ClosePrice − ACTRIS_BuyersClsgCostPdbySell − ACTRIS_RepairsAmount (a blank counts as $0). Summarized by the arithmetic mean in the slices.
- The data
- 96 resale sales. Average $1,055,393; median $840,850; standard deviation $609,288; middle half (25th–75th percentile) $665,000–$1,159,750; lowest $498,877, highest $4,490,000. 59 sales had a seller payment; their median payment was $8,000.
8.1.2 Net price per SF
- In simple terms
- Net sale price divided by the heated and cooled square feet. It puts homes of different sizes on the same footing: did buyers pay more for each square foot, not just for more square feet?
- Statistically
- psf = Net ÷ LivingArea, per sale; summarized by the mean of the per-sale ratios.
- The data
- 96 resale sales. Average $292; median $271; standard deviation $70; middle half (25th–75th percentile) $246–$318; lowest $184, highest $595.
8.1.3 Living area
- In simple terms
- The heated and cooled space, as listed in the MLS. Garages and porches are not counted.
- Statistically
- RESO LivingArea, in square feet. Sales under 400 SF are treated as entry errors and left out.
- The data
- 96 resale sales. Average 3,453; median 3,340; standard deviation 1,008; middle half (25th–75th percentile) 2,757–4,075; lowest 1,865, highest 7,540.
8.1.4 Year built
- In simple terms
- The year the home was finished, as listed in the MLS. It shows whether a group leans to older or newer phases of the community.
- Statistically
- RESO YearBuilt; summarized by the median, with the 25th–75th percentile (middle half) on the charts.
- The data
- 96 resale sales. Average 2004; median 2005; standard deviation 6; middle half (25th–75th percentile) 1999–2007; lowest 1988, highest 2020.
8.1.5 Days on market
- In simple terms
- How many days the home was on the market before the buyer's offer was accepted, counting any earlier listing periods (relists). This is the days on market agents and clients quote.
- Statistically
- CDOM = max(CumulativeDaysOnMarket, DaysOnMarket, PurchaseContractDate − ListingContractDate). The MLS counter can freeze at a price change, so the contract-date gap is a floor. Summarized by the median, because a few homes that sat for months pull an average up.
- The data
- 96 resale sales. Average 67; median 43; standard deviation 71; middle half (25th–75th percentile) 19–92; lowest 0, highest 378. 2 sales went under contract on their listing date (0 days).
8.1.6 Discount from original list
- In simple terms
- How far below the first asking price the home sold, after seller payments. It measures how much negotiating room sellers gave up. A negative figure means the home sold above its first asking price.
- Statistically
- Discount % = (OriginalListPrice − Net) ÷ OriginalListPrice × 100, per sale; summarized by the mean.
- The data
- 96 resale sales. Average 6.9%; median 6.1%; standard deviation 5.9%; middle half (25th–75th percentile) 3.2%–9.5%; lowest −8.0%, highest 32.3%. 3 sales closed above their first asking price.
8.1.7 Price cut before sale
- In simple terms
- The asking price was lowered at least once before the home went under contract.
- Statistically
- Indicator: ListPrice at close < OriginalListPrice. Reported as the share of sales (%).
- The data
- 48 of 96 resale sales (50.0%).
8.1.8 Seller paid closing costs or repairs
- In simple terms
- The seller paid some of the buyer's closing costs or repairs.
- Statistically
- Indicator: ACTRIS_BuyersClsgCostPdbySell + ACTRIS_RepairsAmount > 0. Reported as the share of sales (%).
- The data
- 59 of 96 resale sales (61.5%).
8.1.9 Has a view
- In simple terms
- The MLS says the home looks over something: a greenbelt or park, trees, golf course, hill country, water and similar.
- Statistically
- View = the View field holds any entry other than “None”, “Neighborhood” or “See Remarks”. No view = only “None” and/or “Neighborhood”. A record whose only entry is “See Remarks” cannot be classified and is left out of the view slice.
- The data
- 67 sales with a view, 27 without, 2 unclassified. Most common View entries: Park/Greenbelt 44, Trees/Woods 37, Neighborhood 36, Hill Country 24, None 12, Panoramic 12, Golf Course 9, Pool 8.
8.2 Methods
8.2.1 Data source
- In simple terms
- Every figure comes from the Austin Board of REALTORS® MLS, read live by ALEX. No figure is estimated or typed in.
- Statistically
- ABOR MLS via secure APIs, read from ALEX's copy of the MLS (refreshed every 15 minutes; this pull as of 2026-11-02 12:45 UTC), every field. Filter: StandardStatus = Closed, PropertyType = Residential, City = Austin, SubdivisionName contains any of “steiner ranch”, “steiner ranch river dance” (case-insensitive). A record is kept when its subdivision name belongs to the Steiner Ranch family, the same rule comparable sales use (it includes Steiner Ranch, River Dance, proven adjacent and priced alike).
- The data
- Pulled November 2, 2026: 164 closed Steiner Ranch records over the prior year, in ZIP 78732. 53 subdivision spellings kept, the most common: Steiner Ranch (34); Steiner Ranch Ph 01 Sec 02-A (9); Steiner Ranch Ph 01 Sec 09 (9); Steiner Ranch Ph 01 Sec 08 (9); Steiner Ranch Ph 01 Sec 7A (8); Steiner Ranch Ph 02 Sec 05 (7); Steiner Ranch Ph 01 Sec 10B (6); Steiner Ranch Ph 01 Sec 03 (6); Steiner Ranch Ph 01 Sec 01 (5); Steiner Ranch Ph 01 Sec 06B (5); Steiner Ranch Ph 01 Sec 10C (5); Steiner Ranch, River Dance Ph 05 (3); and 41 more (58 records). Names found by the search but not part of Steiner Ranch, left out: Steiner Ranch Parkside (8); Steiner Ranch Casitas Sub-Cond (2); The Retreat at Steiner Ranch (2); Lakeview At Steiner Ranch (2); Fairways At Steiner Ranch (2); River Dance Ph 03- Steiner Ranch (1); Steiner Ranch Casitas (1); Steiner Ranch Phs 1 Sec 10b (1); The Grove at Steiner Ranch (1); River Dance Steiner Ranch (1); STEINER RANCH PHS 1 SEC 5B (1); STEINER RANCH PHS 2 SEC 3 C (1); Steiner Ranch Phs 1 Sec 3 (1); River Dance Ph 6A, Steiner Ranch (1); View At Steiner Ranch Condomin (1); Steiner Ranch I River Dance (1).
8.2.2 Study window
- In simple terms
- The most recent 180 days of closed sales: recent enough to describe today's market, long enough to give each group plenty of sales.
- Statistically
- CloseDate from May 6, 2026 to November 1, 2026 inclusive.
- The data
- 96 single-family sales in the window: 96 resale, 0 new construction.
8.2.3 Resale and new construction
- In simple terms
- A resale home was previously owned. New construction is sold by the builder and behaves differently, so it is kept out of every analysis and reported once on its own.
- Statistically
- New construction = NewConstructionYN true, or PropertyCondition contains “New Construction” or “Under Construction”. Everything else is resale.
- The data
- 96 resale; 0 new construction.
8.2.4 Sales left out
- In simple terms
- A few records cannot be used as entered and are left out before any analysis.
- Statistically
- Excluded: PropertySubType other than Single Family Residence; no OriginalListPrice; LivingArea under 400 SF; seller payments above 10% of ClosePrice (treated as entry errors).
- The data
- 2 sale(s) other than single-family homes (condo, townhome and similar); 1 sale(s) with no original list price
8.2.5 Quartiles and groups
- In simple terms
- Sales lined up from lowest to highest and cut into four groups of about equal size. Each group is named by its range, for example “Under $670K”.
- Statistically
- Sort by the slicing variable; cut k sits at round(nk/4), k = 1…3. A cut that would split tied values moves to the nearer edge of the tie. A group under 3 sales merges into its smaller neighbor. Range names use the next group's lowest value (“Under”) and the previous group's highest value (“Over”/“After”).
- The data
- Quartiles by net sale price: Under $670K: $498,877–$650,000 (24 sales); $670K–$840K: $670,000–$839,700 (24 sales); $842K–$1.16M: $842,000–$1,158,000 (24 sales); Over $1.16M: $1,165,000–$4,490,000 (24 sales)
Quartiles by living area: Under 2,760 SF: 1,865–2,749 SF (24 sales); 2,760–3,334 SF: 2,760–3,334 SF (24 sales); 3,347–4,067 SF: 3,347–4,067 SF (24 sales); Over 4,067 SF: 4,100–7,540 SF (24 sales)
Quartiles by year built: Before 2000: 1988–1999 (26 sales); 2000–2004: 2000–2004 (21 sales); 2005–2006: 2005–2006 (23 sales); After 2006: 2007–2020 (26 sales)
View and no view: View: MLS lists a view (67 sales); No view: None or Neighborhood (27 sales)
8.2.6 Average and median
- In simple terms
- The average adds the values and divides by how many; one very expensive home can pull it up. The median is the middle value, with half above and half below.
- Statistically
- Mean x̄ = (1/n) Σ xᵢ; median = 50th percentile. Price, price per SF, living area and discount use the mean; days on market and year built use the median (skewed or whole-year values).
- The data
- Net sale price: average $1,055,393, median $840,850. Days on market: average 67, median 43: the average is pulled up by a few long listings.
8.2.7 Kruskal–Wallis test
- In simple terms
- Checks whether a measure really differs across the four groups of a slice. It uses each sale's rank, not its value, so a few extreme sales cannot drive the answer.
- Statistically
- H = [12/(n(n+1))] Σ Rⱼ²/nⱼ − 3(n+1), compared with χ² on k − 1 degrees of freedom (Kruskal & Wallis, 1952). Effect size ε² = H/(n − 1): ≥ .01 small, ≥ .06 medium, ≥ .14 large (Tomczak & Tomczak, 2014). A slice is tested only when every group has at least 5 sales; smaller groups are described, not tested.
- The data
- Run on every measure in sections 3–5; each result is in 8.3.
8.2.8 Mann–Whitney U test
- In simple terms
- The same check when there are only two groups: view against no view.
- Statistically
- Two-sided U test (Mann & Whitney, 1947). Effect size = rank-biserial correlation |1 − 2U/(n₁n₂)|: ≥ .10 small, ≥ .30 medium, ≥ .50 large (Kerby, 2014; Cohen, 1988).
- The data
- Run on every measure in section 6; results in 8.3.
8.2.9 Chi-square test
- In simple terms
- Checks whether a yes/no share (price cut, seller payment, view) differs between groups more than chance would.
- Statistically
- Pearson χ² on the 2 × k table of counts, no continuity correction (Pearson, 1900). Effect size Cramér's V = √(χ²/n): ≥ .10 small, ≥ .30 medium, ≥ .50 large (Cramér, 1946).
- The data
- Run on the three shares in every slice; results in 8.3.
8.2.10 Real difference (significance)
- In simple terms
- “Real difference” means a gap this large would be very unlikely if the groups were really alike. Because many measures are checked in each slice, the bar is set higher than usual.
- Statistically
- Significant when p < 0.05 ÷ m, where m is the number of measures tested in that slice (Bonferroni; Dunn, 1961). The slicing variable itself differs by design and is not tested.
- The data
- Quartiles by net sale price: m = 8, threshold p < 0.0063; Quartiles by living area: m = 8, threshold p < 0.0063; Quartiles by year built: m = 8, threshold p < 0.0063; View and no view: m = 8, threshold p < 0.0063
8.2.11 Size of a difference
- In simple terms
- A difference can be real but small. The size word (small, medium, large) says how much the groups pull apart.
- Statistically
- ε² for Kruskal–Wallis, rank-biserial r for Mann–Whitney, Cramér's V for chi-square, with the thresholds above; below the small threshold the size is “negligible”.
- The data
- 15 real differences across the four slices; sizes are listed in 8.3.
8.2.12 Rounding in the text
- In simple terms
- Headings and sentences round figures so they read easily; the tables at the end of each section give them in full.
- Statistically
- Prices in headings round to the nearest $1K; price per SF and days on market to the nearest whole number; living area to the nearest 10 SF; shares and percentage gaps to whole percents.
- The data
- Days on market is always shown in days.
8.3 Test results
Every test behind every gold box. Statistic, degrees of freedom (df), p-value, the threshold it must beat, and the size of the difference.
8.3.1 Quartiles by net sale price
| Measure | Test | Statistic | df | p-value | Threshold | Real difference? | Effect size | Size |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net price per SF | Kruskal–Wallis | H = 56.85 | 3 | < 0.0001 | p < 0.0063 | Yes | ε² = 0.598 | large |
| Living area | Kruskal–Wallis | H = 78.95 | 3 | < 0.0001 | p < 0.0063 | Yes | ε² = 0.831 | large |
| Year built | Kruskal–Wallis | H = 29.69 | 3 | < 0.0001 | p < 0.0063 | Yes | ε² = 0.313 | large |
| Days on market | Kruskal–Wallis | H = 5.99 | 3 | 0.1121 | p < 0.0063 | Unclear | ε² = 0.063 | medium |
| Discount from original list | Kruskal–Wallis | H = 4.25 | 3 | 0.2359 | p < 0.0063 | Unclear | ε² = 0.045 | small |
| Price cut before sale | Chi-square | χ² = 0.67 | 3 | 0.8810 | p < 0.0063 | Unclear | Cramér’s V = 0.083 | negligible |
| Seller paid closing costs or repairs | Chi-square | χ² = 0.13 | 3 | 0.9877 | p < 0.0063 | Unclear | Cramér’s V = 0.037 | negligible |
| Has a view | Chi-square | χ² = 21.89 | 3 | < 0.0001 | p < 0.0063 | Yes | Cramér’s V = 0.477 | medium |
8.3.2 Quartiles by living area
| Measure | Test | Statistic | df | p-value | Threshold | Real difference? | Effect size | Size |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net sale price | Kruskal–Wallis | H = 78.57 | 3 | < 0.0001 | p < 0.0063 | Yes | ε² = 0.827 | large |
| Net price per SF | Kruskal–Wallis | H = 36.01 | 3 | < 0.0001 | p < 0.0063 | Yes | ε² = 0.379 | large |
| Year built | Kruskal–Wallis | H = 30.11 | 3 | < 0.0001 | p < 0.0063 | Yes | ε² = 0.317 | large |
| Days on market | Kruskal–Wallis | H = 9.47 | 3 | 0.0236 | p < 0.0063 | Unclear | ε² = 0.100 | medium |
| Discount from original list | Kruskal–Wallis | H = 4.08 | 3 | 0.2532 | p < 0.0063 | Unclear | ε² = 0.043 | small |
| Price cut before sale | Chi-square | χ² = 2.33 | 3 | 0.5062 | p < 0.0063 | Unclear | Cramér’s V = 0.156 | small |
| Seller paid closing costs or repairs | Chi-square | χ² = 0.48 | 3 | 0.9224 | p < 0.0063 | Unclear | Cramér’s V = 0.071 | negligible |
| Has a view | Chi-square | χ² = 19.91 | 3 | 0.0002 | p < 0.0063 | Yes | Cramér’s V = 0.455 | medium |
8.3.3 Quartiles by year built
| Measure | Test | Statistic | df | p-value | Threshold | Real difference? | Effect size | Size |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net sale price | Kruskal–Wallis | H = 31.86 | 3 | < 0.0001 | p < 0.0063 | Yes | ε² = 0.335 | large |
| Net price per SF | Kruskal–Wallis | H = 29.30 | 3 | < 0.0001 | p < 0.0063 | Yes | ε² = 0.308 | large |
| Living area | Kruskal–Wallis | H = 27.54 | 3 | < 0.0001 | p < 0.0063 | Yes | ε² = 0.290 | large |
| Days on market | Kruskal–Wallis | H = 8.62 | 3 | 0.0349 | p < 0.0063 | Unclear | ε² = 0.091 | medium |
| Discount from original list | Kruskal–Wallis | H = 8.26 | 3 | 0.0410 | p < 0.0063 | Unclear | ε² = 0.087 | medium |
| Price cut before sale | Chi-square | χ² = 3.98 | 3 | 0.2640 | p < 0.0063 | Unclear | Cramér’s V = 0.204 | small |
| Seller paid closing costs or repairs | Chi-square | χ² = 13.19 | 3 | 0.0042 | p < 0.0063 | Yes | Cramér’s V = 0.371 | medium |
| Has a view | Chi-square | χ² = 11.26 | 3 | 0.0104 | p < 0.0063 | Unclear | Cramér’s V = 0.343 | medium |
8.3.4 View and no view
| Measure | Test | Statistic | df | p-value | Threshold | Real difference? | Effect size | Size |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net sale price | Mann–Whitney U | U = 1,218.50 | — | 0.0088 | p < 0.0063 | Unclear | rank-biserial r = 0.347 | medium |
| Net price per SF | Mann–Whitney U | U = 1,212.00 | — | 0.0103 | p < 0.0063 | Unclear | rank-biserial r = 0.340 | medium |
| Living area | Mann–Whitney U | U = 1,249.00 | — | 0.0040 | p < 0.0063 | Yes | rank-biserial r = 0.381 | medium |
| Year built | Mann–Whitney U | U = 1,268.50 | — | 0.0023 | p < 0.0063 | Yes | rank-biserial r = 0.402 | medium |
| Days on market | Mann–Whitney U | U = 1,167.50 | — | 0.0282 | p < 0.0063 | Unclear | rank-biserial r = 0.291 | small |
| Discount from original list | Mann–Whitney U | U = 1,244.00 | — | 0.0046 | p < 0.0063 | Yes | rank-biserial r = 0.375 | medium |
| Price cut before sale | Chi-square | χ² = 4.21 | 1 | 0.0402 | p < 0.0063 | Unclear | Cramér’s V = 0.212 | small |
| Seller paid closing costs or repairs | Chi-square | χ² = 2.94 | 1 | 0.0861 | p < 0.0063 | Unclear | Cramér’s V = 0.177 | small |
8.4 Data notes
Left out of the analysis: 0 new-construction sales (basic statistics only, section 7); 2 sale(s) other than single-family homes (condo, townhome and similar); 1 sale(s) with no original list price. Statistics: Python, NumPy 2.5.3, SciPy 1.18.1.
8.5 References
- Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
- Cramér, H. (1946). Mathematical Methods of Statistics. Princeton University Press.
- Dunn, O. J. (1961). Multiple comparisons among means. JASA, 56(293), 52–64.
- Kerby, D. S. (2014). The simple difference formula: an approach to teaching nonparametric correlation. Comprehensive Psychology, 3, 11.IT.3.1.
- Kruskal, W. H., & Wallis, W. A. (1952). Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. JASA, 47(260), 583–621.
- Mann, H. B., & Whitney, D. R. (1947). On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically larger than the other. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 18(1), 50–60.
- Pearson, K. (1900). On the criterion that a given system of deviations… Philosophical Magazine, 50(302), 157–175.
- Tomczak, M., & Tomczak, E. (2014). The need to report effect size estimates revisited. Trends in Sport Sciences, 21(1), 19–25.
This is a market study of closed sales, not an appraisal or an opinion of value for any home. The analysis covers 96 closed MLS resale sales; the 0 new-construction sales appear only in their own section, as basic statistics. Sale and listing data: ABOR MLS via secure APIs, pulled November 2, 2026. Map data © OpenStreetMap contributors. ALEX Companies · Licensed by the Texas Real Estate Commission · Broker: Alexander Tiffany Southwest, LLC (ALEX Real Estate), #565194-BB · Diane Hart Alexander, Designated Broker, #574877-B.