the Asheville market · Data as of · ALEX Intelligence
| # | County | Net households |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pinellas County, FL | 113 |
| 2 | Palm Beach County, FL | 108 |
| 3 | Broward County, FL | 90 |
| 4 | Hillsborough County, FL | 88 |
| 5 | Miami-Dade County, FL | 86 |
| 6 | Los Angeles County, CA | 77 |
| 7 | Sarasota County, FL | 70 |
| 8 | Travis County, TX | 63 |
| 9 | Wake County, NC | 58 |
| 10 | Cook County, IL | 56 |
Read this carefully: A county appears only where the IRS disclosed the flow in BOTH directions; a one-way disclosure would make a net figure that is really a missing number. The IRS withholds county-to-county flows below its disclosure threshold, so a county missing from this table is one whose flow was too small to publish, not one nobody moved from. Every total here is a total of disclosed flows and is therefore a floor.
https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/countyinflow2223.csv https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/countyoutflow2223.csvEvery figure on this page is computed directly from the dataset named above by ALEX Intelligence. No figure on this page was written by hand or by a language model. The query is stated so that anyone can re-run it and obtain the same table.