the Midlands · Data as of · ALEX Intelligence
| # | County | Net households |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | York County, SC | 129 |
| 2 | Orangeburg County, SC | 118 |
| 3 | Lancaster County, SC | 109 |
| 4 | Florence County, SC | 99 |
| 5 | Sumter County, SC | 89 |
| 6 | Dorchester County, SC | 55 |
| 7 | Cumberland County, NC | 54 |
| 8 | Miami-Dade County, FL | 48 |
| 9 | Kings County, NY | 46 |
| 10 | Palm Beach County, FL | 43 |
Read this carefully: A county appears only where the IRS disclosed the flow in BOTH directions; a one-way disclosure would make a net figure that is really a missing number. The IRS withholds county-to-county flows below its disclosure threshold, so a county missing from this table is one whose flow was too small to publish, not one nobody moved from. Every total here is a total of disclosed flows and is therefore a floor.
https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/countyinflow2223.csv https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/countyoutflow2223.csvEvery figure on this page is computed directly from the dataset named above by ALEX Intelligence. No figure on this page was written by hand or by a language model. The query is stated so that anyone can re-run it and obtain the same table.