the Birmingham market · Data as of · ALEX Intelligence
| # | County | Net households |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tuscaloosa County, AL | 162 |
| 2 | Montgomery County, AL | 150 |
| 3 | Dallas County, AL | 69 |
| 4 | Mobile County, AL | 62 |
| 5 | Los Angeles County, CA | 39 |
| 6 | Lee County, AL | 38 |
| 7 | Autauga County, AL | 35 |
| 8 | Houston County, AL | 35 |
| 9 | Tallapoosa County, AL | 33 |
| 10 | Calhoun County, AL | 32 |
Read this carefully: A county appears only where the IRS disclosed the flow in BOTH directions; a one-way disclosure would make a net figure that is really a missing number. The IRS withholds county-to-county flows below its disclosure threshold, so a county missing from this table is one whose flow was too small to publish, not one nobody moved from. Every total here is a total of disclosed flows and is therefore a floor.
https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/countyinflow2223.csv https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/countyoutflow2223.csvEvery figure on this page is computed directly from the dataset named above by ALEX Intelligence. No figure on this page was written by hand or by a language model. The query is stated so that anyone can re-run it and obtain the same table.