Boulder County · Data as of · ALEX Intelligence
| # | County | Net households |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Travis County, TX | 85 |
| 2 | Cook County, IL | 83 |
| 3 | Arapahoe County, CO | 55 |
| 4 | Harris County, TX | 50 |
| 5 | Santa Clara County, CA | 48 |
| 6 | Los Angeles County, CA | 44 |
| 7 | Dallas County, TX | 40 |
| 8 | Tarrant County, TX | 35 |
| 9 | Riverside County, CA | 35 |
| 10 | Contra Costa County, CA | 25 |
Read this carefully: A county appears only where the IRS disclosed the flow in BOTH directions; a one-way disclosure would make a net figure that is really a missing number. The IRS withholds county-to-county flows below its disclosure threshold, so a county missing from this table is one whose flow was too small to publish, not one nobody moved from. Every total here is a total of disclosed flows and is therefore a floor.
https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/countyinflow2223.csv https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/countyoutflow2223.csvEvery figure on this page is computed directly from the dataset named above by ALEX Intelligence. No figure on this page was written by hand or by a language model. The query is stated so that anyone can re-run it and obtain the same table.