Dallas-Fort Worth · Data as of · ALEX Intelligence
| # | County | Net households |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cooke County, TX | 146 |
| 2 | Grayson County, TX | 141 |
| 3 | Volusia County, FL | 138 |
| 4 | Palo Pinto County, TX | 128 |
| 5 | Van Zandt County, TX | 108 |
| 6 | El Paso County, TX | 107 |
| 7 | Lee County, FL | 106 |
| 8 | Montague County, TX | 106 |
| 9 | Hopkins County, TX | 104 |
| 10 | Virginia Beach city, VA | 98 |
Read this carefully: Only counties the IRS disclosed in both vintages, under the same FIPS code and above a minimum flow in each, are compared, because disclosure thresholds move between years and a flow that appears or vanishes at the margin is not evidence that anybody's behaviour changed. Connecticut is excluded throughout: its counties were replaced by planning regions, so no Connecticut geography is comparable across the change. The IRS withholds county-to-county flows below its disclosure threshold, so a county missing from this table is one whose flow was too small to publish, not one nobody moved from. Every total here is a total of disclosed flows and is therefore a floor.
https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/countyinflow2223.csv https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/countyoutflow2223.csv https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/countyinflow2122.csv https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/countyoutflow2122.csvEvery figure on this page is computed directly from the dataset named above by ALEX Intelligence. No figure on this page was written by hand or by a language model. The query is stated so that anyone can re-run it and obtain the same table.