the Killeen-Temple market · Data as of · ALEX Intelligence
| # | County | Net households |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Travis County, TX | 196 |
| 2 | Williamson County, TX | 193 |
| 3 | Los Angeles County, CA | 109 |
| 4 | San Diego County, CA | 80 |
| 5 | El Paso County, TX | 61 |
| 6 | San Bernardino County, CA | 60 |
| 7 | Clark County, NV | 54 |
| 8 | Riverside County, CA | 52 |
| 9 | Burnet County, TX | 46 |
| 10 | Montgomery County, TN | 39 |
Read this carefully: A county appears only where the IRS disclosed the flow in BOTH directions; a one-way disclosure would make a net figure that is really a missing number. The IRS withholds county-to-county flows below its disclosure threshold, so a county missing from this table is one whose flow was too small to publish, not one nobody moved from. Every total here is a total of disclosed flows and is therefore a floor.
https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/countyinflow2223.csv https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/countyoutflow2223.csvEvery figure on this page is computed directly from the dataset named above by ALEX Intelligence. No figure on this page was written by hand or by a language model. The query is stated so that anyone can re-run it and obtain the same table.