the Colorado Springs market · Data as of · ALEX Intelligence
| # | County | Net households |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Los Angeles County, CA | 157 |
| 2 | San Diego County, CA | 154 |
| 3 | Arapahoe County, CO | 136 |
| 4 | Honolulu County, HI | 115 |
| 5 | Harris County, TX | 106 |
| 6 | Orange County, CA | 103 |
| 7 | Riverside County, CA | 81 |
| 8 | Tarrant County, TX | 77 |
| 9 | Travis County, TX | 68 |
| 10 | Broward County, FL | 67 |
Read this carefully: A county appears only where the IRS disclosed the flow in BOTH directions; a one-way disclosure would make a net figure that is really a missing number. The IRS withholds county-to-county flows below its disclosure threshold, so a county missing from this table is one whose flow was too small to publish, not one nobody moved from. Every total here is a total of disclosed flows and is therefore a floor.
https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/countyinflow2223.csv https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/countyoutflow2223.csvEvery figure on this page is computed directly from the dataset named above by ALEX Intelligence. No figure on this page was written by hand or by a language model. The query is stated so that anyone can re-run it and obtain the same table.