The places sending the Greensboro-Winston-Salem-High Point market fewer households than a year ago

the Greensboro-Winston-Salem-High Point market · Data as of 2026-09-18 · ALEX Intelligence

Read this carefully: Only counties the IRS disclosed in both vintages, under the same FIPS code and above a minimum flow in each, are compared, because disclosure thresholds move between years and a flow that appears or vanishes at the margin is not evidence that anybody's behaviour changed. Connecticut is excluded throughout: its counties were replaced by planning regions, so no Connecticut geography is comparable across the change. The IRS withholds county-to-county flows below its disclosure threshold, so a county missing from this table is one whose flow was too small to publish, not one nobody moved from. Every total here is a total of disclosed flows and is therefore a floor.

Methodology

Source:

U.S. Internal Revenue Service, Statistics of Income Migration Data, county-to-county inflows, 2021-22 and 2022-23

Measure

Change in households, ranked lowest first across every U.S. county the IRS recorded sending households to the Greensboro-Winston-Salem-High Point market (Davidson, Davie, Forsyth, Guilford, Randolph, Rockingham, Stokes, Yadkin, NC) in both the 2021-22 and 2022-23 vintages (109 ranked in total).

Universe

Every U.S. county the IRS disclosed a flow with. Counties whose flow fell below the IRS disclosure threshold are absent from the source file altogether, so this ranking is of disclosed flows and its totals are a floor rather than a complete count of movers.

Vintage

2023

Reproduce this query

https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/countyinflow2223.csv https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/countyinflow2122.csv

Every figure on this page is computed directly from the dataset named above by ALEX Intelligence. No figure on this page was written by hand or by a language model. The query is stated so that anyone can re-run it and obtain the same table.